Quantcast
Channel: Symantec Connect - Endpoint Protection - Discussions
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10484

Trying to Understand GUP Precedence in this way of Configuration

$
0
0
I need a solution

Hi Guys , I know how GUP works and what are the diffrent types and the mehacinism it uses to do the download and how we can configure it. However there is a particular scenerio I am trying to understand as how thing will work exactly in such kind of configuration . Would appreciate your expert opinions and suggestion in such scenerio.

Group A contains the following subnets 192.168.1.0 -x.x.3.0 , 10.1.1.1.0 - x.x.3.0 . Have the following options enabled for this group ( Multiple GUP= 192.168.1.1, 10.1.1.1)

Group B contains the following subnets 192.168.9.0 - x.x.11.0 , 10.9.9.0 - x.x.11.0 . Having the following options enabled for this group ( Multiple GUP= 192.168.9.1 and 10.9.9.9.1 )

Explicit Group mappings are like this  :-  

Group A

Local Subnet        Explicit GUP

192.168.2.0          192.168.1.1

192.168.3.0          192.168.1.1

10.1.2.0                10.1.1.1

10.1.3.0                10.1.1.1

192.168.2.0          192.168.9.1

192.168.3.0          192.168.9.1

10.1.2.0                10.9.9.1

10.1.3.0                10.9.9.1

Group B

Local Subnet        Explicit GUP

192.168.10.0          192.168.9.1

192.168.11.0          192.168.9.1

10.9.10.0                10.9.9.1

10.9.11.0                10.9.9.1

192.168.10.0          192.168.1.1

192.168.11.0          192.168.1.1

10.9.10.0                10.1.1.1

10.9.11.0                10.1.1.1

Now since each local subnet dont have any multiple GUP in their own local subnet so that will be using GUP mappings to obtain content definations . 

Now as you can see that each subnet has two explict GUP mapping each ? Now what would be the precedence for the local subnet to pickup explict GUP since for each subnet we have two explicit GUP mappings ? 

Would it pick the explicit GUP in the order it is defined ( match the top entry) or the Explicit GUP that is defined first and ignore the below entry for the same local subnet and explicit GUP mapping entry? and in case if the first explicit GUP is not reachable it will try the second for same local subnet ( Failover)

What would be the logic here ?

Thanks

0

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10484

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>